Preview

Obesity and metabolism

Advanced search

The Long-Term Outcomes of Mini-Gastric Bypass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Morbid Obesity

https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13104

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is considered one of the leading global health issues. According to a meta-analysis published in the Lancet, in 2024 there were 880 million adults and 159 million children with obesity worldwide. Surgical treatment is one of the main methods for managing morbid obesity. There are several options for surgical treatment, but mini-gastric bypass is gaining popularity among bariatric surgeries. The operation is considered effective in reducing body mass and achieving remission of obesity-related comorbidities. The main advantage of this type of surgical intervention is the combination of relative simplicity and safety of the operation compared to other shunting bariatric interventions with sufficient efficacy on the course of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Despite the advantages of this technique, there is limited research published in this area.

AIM: Assess the long-term outcomes of mini-gastric bypass in patients with morbid obesity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study presents the results of a 2-year follow-up of 30 patients who underwent mini-gastric bypass surgery. The patients' average age was 52.5 [50–56.5] years, and their preoperative BMI was 50.0 kg/m2 [46.2–59.6]. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months over a two-year period post-surgery. During the observation period, anthropometric data (BMI, waist circumference, hip circumference, excess weight loss percentage — EWL, total weight loss percentage — TWL), fasting blood glucose level, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and postoperative adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: After two years post-surgery, the median BMI value was 33.6 kg/m2 [28.4–36.5] (p<0.001) with an excess weight loss of 33.6% [28.4–36.4] (p<0.001). The greatest excess weight loss of 35.6% [26.6–54.2] (p<0.001) and 56.0% [39.0–56.0] (p<0.001) was observed at 6 and 12 months of the study, respectively. Similar results were also noted for other parameters. During the study period, remission of type 2 diabetes was achieved in 40% of patients (n=12) at 12 months of observation and in 80% of patients (n=24) at 24 months of observation. A significant reduction in adverse events was observed in the second year of the study compared to the first year.

CONCLUSION: Therefore, mini-gastric bypass surgery is an effective bariatric procedure that leads to weight loss and remission of type 2 diabetes.

About the Authors

O. A. Shumkov
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology – Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RICEL – Branch of IC&G SB RAS)
Russian Federation

Oleg A. Shumkov, MD, PhD

6 Arbuzov street, 630117 Novosibirsk

ResearcherID: AAJ-8970-2020

Scopus Author ID: 44961205500 


Competing Interests:

Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных
и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи.



E. V. Sobolevskaya
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology – Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RICEL – Branch of IC&G SB RAS)
Russian Federation

Elvira V. Sobolevskaya 

ResearcherID: AEC-9192-2022

Scopus Author ID: 58093159400


Competing Interests:

Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных
и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи.



V. V. Anishchenko
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology – Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RICEL – Branch of IC&G SB RAS)
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Anishchenko 

Scopus Author ID: 56956612600 


Competing Interests:

Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных
и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи.



E. A. Koroleva
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology – Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RICEL – Branch of IC&G SB RAS)
Russian Federation

Elena A. Koroleva, MD, PhD, senior research associate 

Scopus Author ID: 55522435000 


Competing Interests:

Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных
и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи.



V. V. Nimaeev
Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology – Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics. Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (RICEL – Branch of IC&G SB RAS)
Russian Federation

Vadim V. Nimaeev, MD, PhD, docent

ResearcherID: O-2258-2017

Scopus Author ID: 6506876136


Competing Interests:

Авторы декларируют отсутствие явных
и потенциальных конфликтов интересов, связанных с публикацией настоящей статьи.



References

1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Worldwide trends in underweight and obesity from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 3663 population-representative studies with 222 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet. 2024;403(10431):1027-1050. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02750-2

2. Federalnaya sluzhba gosudarstvennoi statistiki. Zdravookhranenii v Rossii. – Moskva, 2023 (In Russ.)

3. Rajaobelina K, Dow C, Romana Mancini F, et al. Population attributable fractions of the main type 2 diabetes mellitus risk factors in women: Findings from the French E3N cohort. J Diabetes. 2019;11(3):242-253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12839

4. Mechanick JI, Apovian C, Brethauer S, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutrition, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of patients undergoing bariatric procedures – 2019 update: cosponsored by American association of clinical endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology, the obesity society, American society for metabolic & bariatric surgery, obesity medicine association, and American society of anesthesiologists – execute summary. Endocr Pract. 2019;25(12):1346-1359. doi: https://doi.org/10.4158/GL-2019-0406

5. Ghusn W, Hage K, Vierkant RA, et al. Type-2 diabetes mellitus remission prediction models after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy based on disease severity scores. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024;208:111091. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111091

6. Heymsfield SB, Wadden TA. Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Management of Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(3):254-266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1514009

7. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: Baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):782–795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3593-1

8. Fiorani C, Coles SR, Kulendran M, et al. Long-Term Quality of Life Outcomes After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-a Comparative Study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(3):1376- 1380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05049-3.

9. Chaim EA, Ramos AC, Cazzo E. Mini-gastric bypass: description of the technique and preliminary results. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017;30(4):264-266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-6720201700040009

10. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю., и др. «Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом» / Под ред. И.И. Дедова, М.В. Шестаковой, А.Ю. Майорова 9-й выпуск. // Сахарный диабет. — 2019. — Т.22. — 1S1. — С.1-144. doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM221S1

11. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю., и др. «Клинические рекомендации — Сахарный диабет 2 типа у взрослых». / Под ред. И.И. Дедова, М.В. Шестаковой, А.Ю. Майорова. // Сахарный диабет. — 2020. — №23(2S) — С. 4-102. doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/DM12507

12. Neuberg M, Blanchet MC, Gignoux B, et al. Long-Term Outcomes After One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in Morbidly Obese Patients. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1379-1384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04287-4

13. Carandina S, Soprani A, Zulian V, et al. Long-Term Results of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Single Center Experience with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years. Obes Surg 2021;31(8):3468-3475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05455-1

14. Ahuja A, Tantia O, Goyal G, et al. MGB-OAGB: Effect of Biliopancreatic Limb Length on Nutritional Deficiency, Weight Loss, and Comorbidity Resolution. Obes. Surg. 2018;28:3439–3445. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3405-7

15. De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini Gastric BypassOne Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement. Obes. Surg. 2018;28:1188–1206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3

16. Musella M, Apers J, Rheinwalt K, et al. Efficacy of Bariatric Surgery in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Remission: The Role of Mini Gastric Bypass/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy at 1 Year of Follow-up. A European survey. Obes. Surg. 2016;26:93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1865-6

17. Ding Z, Jin L, Song Y, et al. Comparison of single-anastomosis gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on type 2 diabetes mellitus remission for obese patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian J. Surg. 2023;46:4152–4160. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.03.062

18. Handzlik-Orlik G, Holecki M, Orlik B., et al. Nutrition management of the post–bariatric surgery patient. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015;30(3):383–392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533614564995

19. Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, noninferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) 2019;393(10178):1299–1309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30475-1

20. Cano-Valderrama O, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio-Herrera MA., et al. Long-term food tolerance after bariatric surgery: comparison of three different surgical techniques. Obes Surg. 2017;27(11):2868–2872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2703-9

21. Rossoni C, Bragança R, Santos Z, et al. OAGB Bowel Function in Patients With up to 5 Years Follow-Up: Updated Outcomes. Obes Surg. 2024;34(1):141-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06917-4


Supplementary files

1. Рисунок 1. Антропометрические данные пациентов — TWL, EWL после мини-гастрошунтирования.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (189KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
2. Рисунок 2. Антропометрические данные пациентов после мини-гастрошунтирования — ИМТ.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (167KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
3. Рисунок 3. Антропометрические данные пациентов — обхват талии, обхват бедер после мини-гастрошунтирования.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (251KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾
4. Рисунок 4. Лабораторные данные — гликированный гемоглобин HbA1c, глюкоза крови натощак после мини-гастрошунтирования.
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (220KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Shumkov O.A., Sobolevskaya E.V., Anishchenko V.V., Koroleva E.A., Nimaeev V.V. The Long-Term Outcomes of Mini-Gastric Bypass in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Morbid Obesity. Obesity and metabolism. 2026;23(1):23-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13104

Views: 765

JATS XML

ISSN 2071-8713 (Print)
ISSN 2306-5524 (Online)