Preview

Obesity and metabolism

Advanced search

A retrospective multicenter study of pegvisomant use in acromegaly within Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13259

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acromegaly is a chronic neuroendocrine disorder, the prognosis of which depends on timely and adequate treatment. A high percentage of non-radical surgical treatment and the problem of resistance to first-line drug therapy necessitate the timely inclusion of second-line drugs.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegvisomant (PEG) therapy in patients with unsatisfactory acromegaly control.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The characteristics and treatment outcomes of 185 patients with acromegaly who did not achieve biochemical remission with somatostatin analogs were analyzed. These patients received PEG therapy at three medical centers in Moscow, Russia, between 2019 and 2024. During treatment, dynamic monitoring of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels, carbohydrate metabolism indicators, liver transaminases, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain were performed.

RESULTS: PEG treatment resulted in sustained biochemical remission of acromegaly in 70.8% of patients. The average daily PEG dose was 15 mg. A direct relationship was established between the drug dose and the initial IGF-1 level, body mass index (BMI), and glycated hemoglobin level. The use of the drug was not associated with significant changes in pituitary adenoma size or the development of serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION: Timely inclusion of a second-line drug (PEG) in the treatment regimen of patients who did not achieve control with high-dose monotherapy with somatostatin analogs allows for achieving sustained biochemical control of acromegaly with minimal side effects.

About the Authors

E. G. Przhyalkovskaya
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology
Russian Federation

Elena G. Przhiyalkovskaya - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



E. E. Filkina
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology
Russian Federation

Ekaterina E. Filkina - clinical resident.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



M. A. Perepelova
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology
Russian Federation

Margarita A. Perepelova - MD, postgraduate student.

11 Dm. Ulyanova street, 117292 Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



E. V. Pronin
Endocrinology Dispensary of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Пронин Евгений Вячеславович

Москва


Competing Interests:

none



I. A. Ilovayskaya
Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky
Russian Federation

Irena A. Ilovaуskaya - Doctor of Medical Science, Рrofessor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



Y. A. Kukushkina
Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky
Russian Federation

Yulia A. Kukushkina

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



D. S. Mikhailova
Moscow Regional Clinical Research Institute named after M.F. Vladimirsky
Russian Federation

Daria S. Mikhailova

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



L. K. Dzeranova
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology
Russian Federation

Larisa K. Dzeranova - MD, Sc.D., Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



E. A. Pigarova
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology
Russian Federation

Ekaterina A. Pigarova - MD, PhD.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



Z. E. Belaya
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology

Zhanna E. Belaya - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



M. B. Antsiferov
Endocrinology Dispensary of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Mikhail B. Antsiferov - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



T. M. Alekseeva
Endocrinology Dispensary of the Moscow Department of Health
Russian Federation

Tatiana M. Alekseeva

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



N. G. Mokrysheva
I.I. Dedov National Medical Research Center of Endocrinology
Russian Federation

Natalia G. Mokrysheva - MD, PhD, Professor.

Moscow


Competing Interests:

none



References

1. Dal J, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Andersen M, Kristensen LØ, Laurberg P, et al. Acromegaly incidence, prevalence, complications and long-term prognosis: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(3):181-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0117

2. Alhawyan FS. Mortality in Acromegalic Patients: Etiology, Trends, and Risk Factors. Cureus. 2021;13(4):e14265. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus

3. Phan K, Xu J, Reddy R, Kalakoti P, Nanda A, Fairhall J. Endoscopic Endonasal versus Microsurgical Transsphenoidal Approach for Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:398-406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.029

4. Colao A, Auriemma RS, Pivonello R, Kasuki L, Gadelha MR. Interpreting biochemical control response rates with first-generation somatostatin analogues in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2016;19(3):235-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0684-z

5. Sandret L, Maison P, Chanson P. Place of cabergoline in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1327-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2443

6. Gadelha MR, Bronstein MD, Brue T, et al. Pasireotide versus continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly (PAOLA): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Diab Endocrinol. 2014;2(11):875–884. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(14)70169-x

7. Ságová I, Mokáň M, Payer J, Vaňuga P. Pegvisomant v liečbe akromegálie [Pegvisomant in the treatment of acromegaly]. Vnitr Lek. 2022;68(E-7):17-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.36290/vnl.2022.101

8. Rebrova D.V., Vorokhobina N.V. Pegvisomant in the treatment of acromegaly. Farmateka. 2024;31(2):55-59. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2024.2.55-59

9. Fleseriu M, Führer-Sakel D, van der Lely AJ, et al. More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185(4):525-538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0239

10. Maione L, Chanson P. National acromegaly registries. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019;33(2):101264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2019.02.001

11. Луценко А.С., Пржиялковская Е.Г., Викулова О.К., Белая Ж.Е., Исаков М.А., и др. Акромегалия: клинико-эпидемиологические данные всероссийского регистра опухолей гипоталамо-гипофизарной области. Сборник тезисов V (XXX) Национального конгресса эндокринологов «Инновационные технологии в эндокринологии» с международным участием (ИТЭ 2024) 21–24 мая 2024 года — М.: 2024; 40

12. Giustina A, Biermasz N, Casanueva FF, et al. Consensus on criteria for acromegaly diagnosis and remission [published correction appears in Pituitary. 2024 Feb;27(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s11102-023-01373-w.]. Pituitary. 2024;27(1):7-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-023-01360-1

13. Franck SE, Muhammad A, van der Lely AJ, Neggers SJ. Combined treatment of somatostatin analogues with pegvisomant in acromegaly. Endocrine. 2016;52(2):206-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0810-8

14. Haberbosch L, Strasburger CJ. Efficacy and Safety of Pegvisomant in the Treatment of Acromegaly. Arch Med Res. 2023;54(8):102884. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.102884

15. Brue T. ACROSTUDY: Status Update on 469 Patients. Horm Res. 2009;71(Suppl 1):34-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000178035

16. van der Lely AJ, Biller BM, Brue T, Buchfelder M, Ghigo E, et al. Long-term safety of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly: comprehensive review of 1288 subjects in ACROSTUDY. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(5):1589-97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2508

17. Dzeranova L.K., Povaliaeva A.A., Romanova A.A., Przhiyalkovskaya E.G., Pigarova E.A., Fedorova N.S. Pegvisomant and current approaches to the medical treatment of acromegaly (literature review and case report). Obesity and metabolism. 2019;16(4):73-79. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/omet12207

18. Pronin E.V., Alekseeva T.M., Antsiferov M.B. The efficacy of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to 1st generation somatostatin analogues // Pharmateca. — 2022. — Vol. 29. — N. 4. — P. 60-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2022.4.60-68

19. Schneider HJ, Kosilek RP, Günther M, Roemmler J, Stalla GK, et al. A novel approach to the detection of acromegaly: accuracy of diagnosis by automatic face classification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):2074-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0237

20. Przhiyalkovskaya E.G., Mokrysheva N.G., Troshina E.A., Melnichenko G.A., Dedov I.I., et al. Guidelines on diagnostics and treatment of acromegaly (draft). Obesity and metabolism. 2024;21(2):215-249. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13153

21. Parkinson C, Burman P, Messig M, Trainer PJ. Gender, body weight, disease activity, and previous radiotherapy influence the response to pegvisomant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(1):190-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1412

22. Sievers C, Baur DM, Schwanke A, Buchfelder M, Droste M, et al. Prediction of therapy response in acromegalic patients under pegvisomant therapy within the German ACROSTUDY cohort. Pituitary. 2015;18(6):916-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0673-2

23. Alexopoulou O, Abrams P, Verhelst J, Poppe K, Velkeniers B, Abs R, Maiter D. Efficacy and tolerability of lanreotide Autogel therapy in acromegalic patients previously treated with octreotide LAR. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;151(3):317-24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1510317

24. Andries M, Glintborg D, Kvistborg A, Hagen C, Andersen M. A 12-month randomized crossover study on the effects of lanreotide Autogel and octreotide long-acting repeatable on GH and IGF-l in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;68(3):473-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03067.x

25. Schopohl J, Strasburger CJ, Caird D, Badenhoop K, Beuschlein F, et al. Efficacy and acceptability of lanreotide Autogel® 120 mg at different dose intervals in patients with acromegaly previously treated with octreotide LAR. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011;119(3):156-62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267244

26. Belaya ZE, Golounina OO, Rozhinskaya LY, Melnichenko GA, Isakov MА, et al. [Epidemiology, clinical manifestations and efficiency of different methods of treatment of acromegaly according to the United Russian Registry of Patients with Pituitary Tumors]. Probl Endokrinol (Mosk). 20204;66(1):93-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl10333

27. Antsiferov M.B., Alekseeva T.M., Pronin V.S. Moscow registry of patients with acromegaly: long-term results of observations // Pharmateca. — 2016. — N. 16. — P. 62-66

28. Trainer PJ, Drake WM, Katznelson L, Freda PU, Herman-Bonert V, et al. Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormone-receptor antagonist pegvisomant. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1171-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200004203421604

29. van der Lely AJ, Hutson RN, Trainer PJ, et al. Long-term Treatment of Acromegaly With Pegvisomant, a Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist. Lancet. 2001;358(9295):1754-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06844-1

30. Fleseriu M, Führer-Sakel D, van der Lely AJ, De Marinis L, Brue T, van der Lans-Bussemaker J, et al. More than a decade of real-world experience of pegvisomant for acromegaly: ACROSTUDY. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185(4):525-538. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0239

31. Ragonese M, Grottoli S, Maffei P, Alibrandi A, Ambrosio MR, et al. How to improve effectiveness of pegvisomant treatment in acromegalic patients. J Endocrinol Invest. 2018;41(5):575-581. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-017-0773-0

32. Pronin E.V., Alekseeva T.M., Antsiferov M.B. The efficacy of pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to 1st generation somatostatin analogues // Pharmateca. — 2022. — Vol. 29. — N. 4. — P. 60-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2022.4.60-68

33. Gadelha MR, Wildemberg LE, Kasuki L. The Future of Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022;107(2):297-308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab726

34. Gadelha MR, Wildemberg LE, Bronstein MD, Gatto F, Ferone D. Somatostatin receptor ligands in the treatment of acromegaly. Pituitary. 2017;20(1):100-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0791-0

35. Pronin EV, Pronin VS, Antsiferov MB, Petryaykin AV, Alexeeva TM, Lapshina AM, Urusova LS, Khoruzhaya AN, Tamaeva SM. Predictors of morphofunctional features of somatotrophic tumors and of the effectiveness of treatment with first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands. Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council. 2024;(6):98-111. (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.21518/ms2024-147

36. Gliga MC, Tătăranu LG, Popescu M, Chinezu L, Paşcanu MI. Immunohistochemical evaluation of biomarkers with predictive role in acromegaly: a literature review. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2023;64(1):25-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.47162/RJME.64.1.03

37. Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, Mirra F, Donfrancesco F, Tartaglione T, et al. Pegvisomant and Pasireotide LAR as second line therapy in acromegaly: clinical effectiveness and predictors of response. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;184(2):217–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0767

38. Esposito D, Ragnarsson O, Johannsson G, Olsson DS. Prolonged diagnostic delay in acromegaly is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020;182(6):523-531. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-0019

39. van der Lely AJ, Jönsson P, Wilton P, Åkerblad AC, Cara J, Ghigo E. Treatment with high doses of pegvisomant in 56 patients with acromegaly: experience from ACROSTUDY. Eur J Endocrinol. 2016;175(4):239-45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-0008

40. Droste M, Domberg J, Buchfelder M, et al. Therapy of acromegalic patients exacerbated by concomitant type 2 diabetes requires higher pegvisomant doses to normalise IGF1 levels. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;171(1):59-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-043

41. Giustina A, Arnaldi G, Bogazzi F, et al. Pegvisomant in acromegaly: an update. J Endocrinol Invest. 2017;40(6):577–89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618017-0614-1

42. Higham CE, Rowles S, Russell-Jones D, Umpleby AM, Trainer PJ. Pegvisomant improves insulin sensitivity and reduces overnight free fatty acid concentrations in patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(7):2459-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2086

43. Ghigo E, Biller BM, Colao A, Kourides IA, Rajicic N, et al. Comparison of pegvisomant and long-acting octreotide in patients with acromegaly naïve to radiation and medical therapy. J Endocrinol Invest. 2009;32(11):924-33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03345774

44. Chiloiro S, Giampietro A, Visconti F, Rossi L, Donfrancesco F, et al. Glucose metabolism outcomes in acromegaly patients on treatment with pasireotide-LAR or ­pasireotide-LAR plus Pegvisomant. Endocrine. 2021;73(3):658-666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-021-02711-3

45. Hannon AM, Thompson CJ, Sherlock M. Diabetes in Patients With Acromegaly. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17(2):8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0838-7

46. Biering H, Saller B, Bauditz J, Pirlich M, Rudolph B, et al. Elevated transaminases during medical treatment of acromegaly: a review of the German pegvisomant surveillance experience and a report of a patient with histologically proven chronic mild active hepatitis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(2):213-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02079

47. Maffei P, Martini C, Pagano C, Sicolo N, Corbetti F. Lipohypertrophy in acromegaly induced by the new growth hormone receptor antagonist pegvisomant. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(4):310-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00017

48. Marazuela M, Lucas T, Alvarez-Escolá C, Puig-Domingo M, de la Torre NG, et al. Long-term treatment of acromegalic patients resistant to somatostatin analogues with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant: its efficacy in relation to gender and previous radiotherapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(4):535-42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-08-0705

49. Rochira V, Zirilli L, Diazzi C, Romano S, Carani C. Clinical and radiological evidence of the recurrence of reversible pegvisomant-related lipohypertrophy at the new site of injection in two women with acromegaly: a case series. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-6-2

50. Buchfelder M, Weigel D, Droste M, Mann K, Saller B, et al. Pituitary tumor size in acromegaly during pegvisomant treatment: experience from MR re-evaluations of the German Pegvisomant Observational Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161(1):27-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-08-0910

51. Doknic M, Stojanovic M, Miljic D, Milicevic M. Medical treatment of acromegaly - When the tumor size matters: A narrative review. Growth Horm IGF Res. 2024;78:101608. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2024.101608


Review

For citations:


Przhyalkovskaya E.G., Filkina E.E., Perepelova M.A., Pronin E.V., Ilovayskaya I.A., Kukushkina Y.A., Mikhailova D.S., Dzeranova L.K., Pigarova E.A., Belaya Z.E., Antsiferov M.B., Alekseeva T.M., Mokrysheva N.G. A retrospective multicenter study of pegvisomant use in acromegaly within Russian Federation. Obesity and metabolism. 2025;22(2):97-110. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13259

Views: 28


ISSN 2071-8713 (Print)
ISSN 2306-5524 (Online)