New diagnostic criterion for a 3% hypertonic saline infusion test for the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia
https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13132
Abstract
AIM: To determine the value of urine osmolality when conducting a test with 3% hypertonic sodium chloride solution, which allows for the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus (DI) and primary polydipsia (PP).
METHODS: An interventional cross-sectional study was conducted at the (Endocrinology Research Center. The study included 90 patients with polyuria-polydipsia syndrome from September 2021 to September 2023. All patients underwent sequential two tests with osmotic stimulation: 3% hypertonic saline infusion test and a water deprivation test. The final diagnosis was established based on the results of a fluid deprivation test, the patient’s anamnestic data (previous operations, diseases of the hypothalamic-pituitary region, the presence of mental illnesses), MRI data (the presence of a hyperintense signal from the posterior pituitary on T1-weighted images, a detected tumor or infiltrative formation of the hypothalamic-pituitary area, presence of Rathke’s pouch cyst).
RESULTS: 48 patients with a final diagnosis of DI and 42 with a final diagnosis of PP were analysed. A cut-off point for urine osmolality during infusion test with 3% hypertonic saline was found: values less than or equal to 377 mOsm/kg support the diagnosis of DI, and values higher than 377 mOsm/kg support the diagnosis of PP. The sensitivity of the criterion is 89%, 95% CI (77%; 97%), specificity — 98% (87%; 100%), PPV — 98% (88%; 100%), NPV — 89% (76%; 96%), accuracy 93% (86%; 98%).
CONCLUSION: The proposed criterion for differential diagnosis has comparable diagnostic accuracy in relation to the differential diagnosis of DI and PP, while the safety of the test may be higher.
About the Authors
N. N. KatamadzeRussian Federation
Nino N. Katamadze - PhD student.
Dmitry Ulyanova street 11 bld 2, 117036 Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
E. A. Pigarova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Pigarova - MD, PhD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
O. Yu. Rebrova
Russian Federation
Olga Yu. Rebrova - MD, PhD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
L. K. Dzeranova
Russian Federation
Larisa K. Dzeranova – ScD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
E. G. Przhiyalkovskaya
Russian Federation
Elena G. Przhiyalkovskaya - MD, PhD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
N. M. Platonova
Russian Federation
Nadegda M. Platonova - MD, PhD.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
E. A. Troshina
Russian Federation
Ekaterina A. Troshina - MD, PhD, Professor.
Moscow
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Robertson GL, Shelton RL, Athar S. The osmoregulation of vasopressin. Kidney Int. 1976;10(1):25-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.1976.76
2. Dedov II, Mel’nichenko GA, Pigarova EA, Dzeranova LK, Rozhinskaya LYa, et al. Federal’nye klinicheskie rekomendacii po diagnostike i lecheniyu nesaharnogo diabeta u vzroslyh. Ozhirenie i metabolizm. 2018;15(2):56-71 (In Russ.) doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/omet9670
3. Miller M, Dalakos T, Moses AM, Fellerman H, Streeten DH. Recognition of partial defects in antidiuretic hormone secretion. Ann Intern Med. 1970;73(5):721-729. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-73-5-721
4. Fenske W, Quinkler M, Lorenz D, et al. Copeptin in the differential diagnosis of the polydipsia-polyuria syndrome--revisiting the direct and indirect water deprivation tests. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1506-1515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2345
5. Fenske W, Allolio B. Clinical review: Current state and future perspectives in the diagnosis of diabetes insipidus: a clinical review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(10):3426-3437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1981
6. Nigro N, Grossmann M, Chiang C, Inder WJ. Polyuria-polydipsia syndrome: a diagnostic challenge. Intern Med J. 2018;48(3):244-253. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13627
7. Pigarova EA. Pervichnie i vtorichnie sindromy gipo- I gipernatriemii v endokrinologii, ih sovremennaya diagnostika i lechenie. [dissertation] Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.)
8. Achinger SG, Ayus JC. Use of Desmopressin in Hyponatremia: Foe and Friend. Kidney Med. 2019;1(2):65-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2019.02.002
9. Fenske W, Refardt J, Chifu I, et al. A Copeptin-Based Approach in the Diagnosis of Diabetes Insipidus. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(5):428-439. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1803760
10. Katamadze NN, Pigarova EA, Dzeranova LK, Rebrova OYu., Troshina E.A. Proba s gipertonicheskim rastvorom dlya differencial’noj diagnostiki nesaharnogo diabeta i pervichnoj polidipsii: ocenka diagnosticheskoj tochnosti. Ozhirenie i metabolizm. 2024;21(1):5-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13093
Review
For citations:
Katamadze N.N., Pigarova E.A., Rebrova O.Yu., Dzeranova L.K., Przhiyalkovskaya E.G., Platonova N.M., Troshina E.A. New diagnostic criterion for a 3% hypertonic saline infusion test for the differential diagnosis of diabetes insipidus and primary polydipsia. Obesity and metabolism. 2024;21(3):263-268. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/omet13132

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).