Preview

Obesity and metabolism

Advanced search

Evaluation of adipose tissue mass with anthropometric and visualization methods; its relation to the components of the metabolic syndrome

https://doi.org/10.14341/2071-8713-4820

Abstract

We performed an estimation of body fat using ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and anthropometry in 60 patients with different types of body weight (BW). Correlation of waist circumference (WC), thickness of subcutaneous fat and visceral fat with components of the metabolic syndrome was studied comparatively between ultrasound and MRI measurements. We noted a preferential increase in the thickness of visceral fat compared with subcutaneous with increasing degree of BW. Significant increase in adipose tissue and the development of metabolic disorders occurs in overweight, making it the state close to obesity. During a routine ultrasound of the abdomen it is advisable to determine the thickness of subcutaneous and visceral fat separately.

References

1. Дедов И.И., Мельниченко Г.А., Фадеев В.В. Эндокринология: учебник. М.: Медицина, 2000: 632 с.

2. Каминский Л.С. Статистическая обработка лабораторных и клинических данных. Л.: Медицина, 1964: 251 с.

3. Мартиросов Э.Г., Николаев Д.В., Руднев С.Г. Технологии и методы определения состава тела человека. М.: Наука, 2006: 248 с.

4. Ожирение: этиология, патогенез, клинические аспекты /под ред. И.И. Дедова, Г.А. Мельниченко. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство, 2004. – 456 с.

5. Сусляева Н.М. Возможности лучевых методов исследования в диагностике висцерального ожирения. Бюллетень сибирской медицины. 2010; 5: 121–128.

6. Armellini F., Zamboni M. Total and intraabdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computed tomography. Int. J. Obes. 1993; 17: 209–214.

7. Armellini F., Zamboni M., Rigo L. Sonography detection of small intraabdominal fat variations. Int. J. Obes. 1991; 15: 847–52.

8. Armellini F., Zamboni M., Castelli S. et al. Measured and predicted total and visceral adipose tissue in women. Correlations with metabolic parameters. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 1994; 18: 641–7.

9. International Diabetes Federation. Worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. Available at: http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/IDF_Metasyndrome_definition.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2005.

10. Donnelly L.F, O'Brien K.J., Dardzinski B.J. et al. Using a phantom to compare MR techniques for determining the ratio of intraabdominal to subcutaneous adipose tissue. AJR. 2003; 180: 993–998.

11. Gallagher D., Heymsfield S.B., Heo M., Jebb S.A., Murgatroyd P.R., Sakamoto Y. Healthy percentage body fat ranges: an approach for developing guidelines based on body mass index. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 72: 694–701.

12. Leite C.C., Wajchenberg B.L., Radominski R. et al. Intraabdominal thickness by ultrasonography to predict risk factors for cardiovascular disease and its correlation with anthropometric measurements. Metabolism. 2002; 51 (8): 1034–1040.


Review

For citations:


 ,  ,  ,  ,   Evaluation of adipose tissue mass with anthropometric and visualization methods; its relation to the components of the metabolic syndrome. Obesity and metabolism. 2013;10(2):23-27. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14341/2071-8713-4820

Views: 925


ISSN 2071-8713 (Print)
ISSN 2306-5524 (Online)